Poetry is often mistaken as lovey-dovey flowery words. Not at all. For at its best, poetry expresses experiences or ideas with tightly muscular or emotionally swift words. It has been known to cut, shock, spin, or stun readers into new thoughts.
As we begin studying poetry, there is no better place to start these days than with war poetry. With America acting more and more like an empire, overreacting and overreaching militarily in the world, especially in Iraq, and with a U.S. president deadset on violence as his hope for the world, American poets and international poets continue responding (see
Poets Against the War).
But war was not all bad for poets. Before the twentieth century, war poetry celebrated the triumphs and glories of warriors, even the violence as in
Homer's Illiad.
Since the late nineteenth century, war became more realistic and less honorable. For instance, poets like American Stephen Crane wrote ironically and cynically about war in
"War is Kind."As poets wrote about World War I, many of them were firsthand witnesses of mustard gas massacres (see John Singer Sargent's painting called
Gassed and read Wilfred Owen's "
Dulce Et Decorum Est"). The English translation of the Latin phrase ("how sweet it is to die for one's country") emphasizes the poet's dark irony about war.
During World War II, millions died as a result of weapons of mass destruction, and many soldiers died in the odd machinery of war--as in the ball turret of a bomber plane (read
"The Death of the Ball Turret Gunner"). Not surprisingly, military weaponry is made first for killing, not protecting. Just look at
the case of Private First Class John D. Hart who, before being killed because of a lack of bulletproof shielding or even metal doors on Humvees, talked with his father on the phone about the Humvee's lack of armor. Brian Hart, the soldier's father, took action with the help of Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, to "up-armor" Humvees.
The U.S. involvement in Vietnam produced more poetry,
anti-war music, and a huge
counter culture movement. Then came military operations in the Persian Gulf, first with
Operation Desert Storm and then with the
Iraq War. Of the wars of the last 50 years, perhaps no more anger has been expressed among poets than about the current war (see
"Orgres" and other poems on this website). Now, with Bush rejecting the announcement by an
international group of physicians and researchers that we have killed close to 650,000 Iraqi civilians since 2003, we will hear from many other poets, I'm sure.
So why does war poetry produce so much passion, and why is it so anti-war in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries? Obviously, the case of Private First Class John D. Hart and the case of 650,000 Iraqi civilians dead are enough to create such animosity towards war. But what can poets accomplish?